Monday, December 19, 2005


NAACP Rebuts Comments Made By Philadelphia Branch President Jerry Mondesire

December 15, 2005

Bruce S. Gordon, NAACP President and CEO, said today that he is outraged by the comments made by Philadelphia branch president Jerry Mondesire about Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb. Gordon said, “I can not respond strongly enough to how I feel about the controversy started by Mondesire’s article. Having spent the first 40 years of my life in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, I have followed the Eagles organization and its players for a long time. Donovan McNabb is one of the best that they have had. He is a great quarterback, an excellent role model and a class act. Whatever possessed Mondesire to take such a negative position on a positive person like McNabb is beyond me. The NAACP has many civil rights issues that require our attention. Criticizing Donovan McNabb is not one of them. However, in light of Mondesire’s criticism it has become a personal priority of mine to set the record straight. I intend to reach out to Mr. MnicNabb personally to offer my apology as well as my support.”

Mondesire spoke as a newspaper owner, columnist and radio host. The NAACP is further investigating this matter to make sure these statements were properly vetted and our policies and procedures were not violated.

Founded in 1909, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is the nation’s oldest and largest civil rights organization. Its half-million adult and youth members throughout the United States and the world are the premier advocates for civil rights in their communities and monitor equal opportunity in the public and private sectors.

CONTACT: NAACP Office of Communications 410.580.5125

Sunday, December 18, 2005


The McNabb Column that's causing so much Controversy within the NAACP


Donovan McNabb: Mediocre at best

By J. Whyatt Mondesire

© Philadelphia Sun

Hey McNabb!Yo--Donny! I'm calling you man.Hey, soup guy, over here!Donovan E. McNabb, you hear me callin' you. Will you please pay attention?For a whole lot of years now, we've heard you crying aloud about being taken seriously as a black quarterback who can camp out in the pocket and deliver rifle shots across midfield right into the fingertips of the fleetest of wideouts and tight ends. Say, like a Doug Williams, the brilliant Grambling star quarterback of a generation ago who went on to break a Super Bowl record for touchdown passes in 1988.

Well....well...I've seen you Donovan E. McNabb--in your formative years as well as your mid-career development--and one thing is certain. Donovan E. McNabb you're no Doug Williams.

The Grambling all-star completed 18 of 29 passes for 340 yards and four touchdowns, capping it off with 35 points in the fourth quarter alone. He followed that performance with three conference championships in 2000, ‘01 and ‘02.

Your record is another matter entirely. In fact this whole dismal season so far has really been a testament of fallen dreams and lost opportunities most of which belongs at your feet (or should I say hands) and that of your coach, Andy Reid who has allowed you to perpetuate a fraud on the field while hiding behind excuses dripping in make-believe racial stereotypes.

Normally this column talks very little about sports because the games that grown men play pale in comparison to the great issues of racism, politics, social calamities, health crisis's, war and peace, etc. which gives us plenty of fertile territory to explore and pontificate about.

However, this week I felt compelled to offer some personal thoughts about your horrific on-field performances this season because at their core there is a lie you have tried to use to hide the fact that in reality you actually are not that good. In essence Donny, you are mediocre at best. And trying to disguise that fact behind some concocted reasoning that African American quarterbacks who can scramble and who can run the ball are somehow lesser field generals than one who can summon up dead-on passes at a whim is more insulting off the field than on.

Your athleticism and unpredictability to sometimes run with the ball earlier in your career not only confused defenses, it also thrilled Eagles fans. At last, said many of us, now we have a multifaceted offensive threat whose talents threaten to not just dominate the NFC East Division, but maybe the whole NFL for several years. We were elated. We were in awe.

We celebrated the boss's giving you that huge lifetime salary deal which meant we'd have you around until it was time for you to join the other retired stars in television's broadcast booth.But then you played the race card and practically all of us fell for your hustle. You scammed us man and there's no way any longer to refrain from "keepin' it real."

We could have remained silent too, if you had found another way to remain effective and a winner. But when your mediocre talent becomes so apparent it's time to call it out.

Through the first four games, you completed 110 of 174 passes (63.2 percent) for a league-leading 1,333 yards and 11 touchdowns.

However, in your last five games, you connected on just 101 of 183 passes (55.2 percent) for 1,174 yards and five touchdowns, while throwing six interceptions, two of which clearly were game losers.

The sports hernia you suffered after the team's Week 3 win over Oakland clearly is a mega factor in the latter numbers. But who can forget your mind numbing fourth-quarter collapse in last year's Super Bowl against New England.Andy Reid may not have seen it. Owner Jeff Lurie may have missed it on the videotaped replay. But Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder "saw" it. You choked brother.

The brash and bombastic Terrell Owens may have committed the unpardonable sin of going public with his put down, but was he fundamentally wrong? The pressure, the hype, the clock--they all just converged and your nerve collapsed under their combined weight. Mediocre isn't horrible in and of itself. Most of us don't live up to our dreams. It's when we fake it that most of the rest of us get irritated.

So, for you to continue to deny we fans (as well as yourself) one of the strongest elements of your game by claiming that "everybody expects black quarterbacks to scramble" not only amounts to a breach of faith but also belittles the real struggles of black athletes who've had to overcome real racial stereotypcasting in addition to downright segregation.College football in the South didn't drop its White Only wall until 1966 four years after James Meredith while trying to enroll at Ole Miss, which went 10-0 that year, even as its practice field was covered federal troops who had bivouacked there.

Earlier this month Sports Illustrated reporting pioneering black players in the vaunted SEC had to endure serious hardships, such as "Fritz Pollard, the black all-America at Brown during World War I, (who) had learned to spin on his back and thrust his cleats in the air when tackled, to protect himself from late hits; how Iowa State's Jack Trice was trampled to death during a 1923 game against Minnesota; and how in 1951, on the first play from scrimmage, an Oklahoma A&M player broke the jaw of Drake running back Johnny Bright, forcing him to abandon football and causing the school to withdraw in protest from the Missouri Valley Conference."

Hey Donny, see any difference yet in your trumped up racial views and those pioneers?

Taken together, your pretty decent arm, strong desire to win, and your instinctive ability to scramble in the backfield gave you an awesome package. Take away any one of the legs from this tripod, and whole thing falls flat as your are right now as you recuperate from the surgery that was long overdue the day you entered the hospital.

Finally, your failure as a team leader off the field to my mind did as much as anything to exacerbate the debacle that has become synonymous with T.O.'s full name.

Professional football is really more about money that sport. The fans know it. The players signs contracts for it. And, of course the owners know it, since they are first and last ones to count it when the season ends.

Just think how the whole media circus could have been avoided had you had the courage to offer only a tiny fraction of your bonus this year to Owens and running back, Brian Westbrook.

The gesture alone would have prompted these guys to run through walls for you. The rest of the team would have praised you. And what the heck were Lurie and team president Joe Banner going to do publicly if they objected or thought you had reach out-of-bounds. Fire you?

Yeah right. Let's really do "keep it real."

Leaders who make sacrifices are the stuff of legends. Who remembers a hoarder except for maybe Midas?

Hey Donny...soup guy! Pull your head out of your million-dollar Campbell's soup bowl for a moment ask which current quarterback in fact made a gesture like that for members of his squad.

Does the name Tom Brady ring a bell? Isn't he the guy who took home last year's Super Bowl ring while you were standing in the soup line?

Friday, December 16, 2005


‘The Apprentice’


I have a confession. Except for network news, newsmagazine shows and sports, I rarely watch television. But…last year, I got hooked on “The Apprentice.” No, not because of Donald Trump, an overrated blowhard, but because of the strategy and creativity needed each week to solve problems.

With that confession out of the way, I feel that I am an authority on why Trump picked Randal Pinkett, a successful and well-educated African-American businessman, over Rebecca Jarvis, an impressive young financial reporter based in Chicago.

For those who missed the final episode Thursday night, Randal was selected by Trump and then was asked if he were in Trump’s shoes, would he also hire Rebecca. Randal replied, “Mr. Trump, I firmly believe that this is ‘The Apprentice,’ that one and only one apprentice, and if you’re going to hire someone tonight, it should be one. It’s not ‘The Apprenti, it’s ‘The Apprentice.’”

Trump said, “Okay, I’m going to leave it at that then. I think I could have been convinced, but you feel that’s the way it should be, I’m going to leave it that way.”

For that, Randal has been roundly criticized. He was booed by many of the audience and Andy Dehnard, writing for MSNBC, claimed, “Randal chose selfishness over selflessness.”

Hold on. Time out. Wait a minute.

All season, Trump has stated that out of the 1 million original applicants, he would select one person to be his apprentice. He did that and now Rebecca’s supporters are saying Randal should have endorsed her also being selected.

Why should he support her?

No one on the show had been nicer, more respected or more coveted as a teammate than Randal. Let’s not forget that even though Randal had been extremely supportive of Rebecca, she double-crossed him in the boardroom, apparently in an effort to get rid of her strongest competitor. Even after that, Randal was loyal to Rebecca, helping her win when she was team captain instead of sabotaging her efforts. In the end, he had no obligation – or reason – to change the rules initially established just so that the runner-up could also be declared a winner. In the three previous episodes, there had been only one winner and even though the competition was close this time – it always is – the best person won.

Finally, as a team leader, Randal was undefeated – three wins and no losses. Rebecca, on the other hand, won only one (working with Randall) and lost two. I’ll concede that Randal stumbled in the last assignment when he did not have an alternative plan for his rained-out charity softball game. But he recovered quickly and raised $11,000 for Autism Speaks, his assigned charity. Rebecca showed flashes of brilliance in her final planning, but failed at the major task: Raising money for her charity, the Elizabeth Glaser AIDS Foundation. She did not raise one cent. Nothing. Zilch. Yahoo ended up making a $100,000 donation, to be split between each of the show's charities, but nothing was raised at the event. And that was the task. In the end, of the competitors that had been on both teams, all of them supported Randal as the better leader. Trump agreed, saying: “Randal, you’re an amazing leader. Rarely have I seen a leader as good as you, and you lead through niceness.”

Trump was right when he said, “Randal, you’re hired.”

Thursday, December 15, 2005


Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays?

The latest survey released by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press shows that by a margin of 63 percent to 23 percent, the American public prefers "Merry Christmas" to non-religious welcomes such as "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings." http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=265
But given a choice, a 45 percent plurality says it does not matter either way.

In the same poll, 81 percent of the public gives retail giant Wal-Mart good grades on its prices; just more than a third --34 percent -- consider it a bad place to work.

Tuesday, December 13, 2005


The Rules of Redemption: How could 'Tookie' Williams have convinced the Governor?

by Nick Sylvester
(c) The Village Voice
December 12, 2005



By early this morning, the State of California will have executed Stanley "Tookie" Williams, the Crips gang co-founder convicted in 1981 of four 1979 robbery-related murders. Williams and his legal team had appealed to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger for clemency—a commutation of Williams's death sentence to life without parole. Since 1993, they asserted, Williams had become a leading spokesman against gang violence, authoring a number of anti-gang children's books, and even netting himself several Nobel Peace Prize nominations in light of so stark a change of heart. Still, Schwarzenegger refused. How could Williams have convinced the governor otherwise?

The rules of redemption—what constitutes redemption, how a prisoner redeems himself clearly and convincingly, to what extent prisons should account for the possibility of redemption—stands to become one of the most compelling conversations to come out of the Williams case.
For California, the mechanism of clemency is understandably, but perhaps unjustifiably nebulous.

The letter to the Governor's Office requesting a commutation of sentence should include:

· The applicant's name (including any aliases) and prison number.
· The county and case number of conviction, if known.
· The date and circumstances of all felony offenses for which the applicant has been convicted.
· The date the applicant was received in prison.
· Why a commutation of sentence is desired or needed.

Also:

Once the formal application is received, the Governor refers it to the Board of Prison Terms (BPT). BPT will conduct an investigation to determine whether the applicant meets the standards set forth in California Penal Code section 4852.05, which states, 'During the period of rehabilitation the person shall live an honest and upright life, shall conduct himself or herself with sobriety and industry, shall exhibit a good moral character, and shall conform to and obey the laws of the land.'

"Plead insanity!" is not a punchline for nothing. The U.S. legal system considers both a defendant's actions per se and the motivations behind them. And while some sudden overturn of capital punishment is unlikely, more explicit criteria for how one's heart can lawfully be considered "changed" could prove to capital punishment advocates that the "good of redemption" often can equal the "good of retribution," as Martin Kaplan, director of the Norman Lear Center and associate dean for programs and planning at the USC Annenberg School for Communication, recently told
the LA Times: "Which is more important: the lesson of criminal deterrence or the lesson of personal reformation?"

In the case of Williams, Marc Cooper goes even further, smartly noting the distinction between "redemption" and "contrition." If Williams did in fact murder those four people (to this day, he maintains his innocence), "there can be no redemption for someone like [him]," writes Cooper. "When a convicted killer or his supporters claim 'rehabilitation' I think it becomes fair game to see what the starting point is of their personal journey. How much do they have to make up for?"

But even that can get tricky. As L.A. radio shock-jock John Kobylt, who's spent the last several months on his AM radio show "John and Ken" antagonizing Williams's sympathizers, baldly points out: "How does writing books make up for the loss of the four people who were brutally shotgunned?"

Governor Schwarzenegger's statement yesterday further rehashed the fact that Williams, to this day, refuses to apologize—"Without an apology and atonement for these senseless and brutal killings there can be no redemption"—proving that perhaps Williams's contrition is merely purported.

So again, how does a death row convict convincingly atone? What sorts of deadlines do we make for him? And had Williams been granted clemency, would we extend the current death row sentences as much as 26 years just to make sure Convict X has been given the full allowance?

And so on. If clemency is the exception, it could stand to have better rules.

Monday, December 12, 2005


Solving another Mystery


Call it a personal quirk. Call it crazy. Or, call it whatever you’d like. But I have always been curious about characters in the background of famous civil rights photographs. When I was editor of Emerge magazine, I assigned one of my reporters, Jimmie Briggs, to find out who was the guy wearing the white cap in the background as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. Jimmie found out that it was Charles J. Jackson, a Jersey City, N.J. policeman [Emerge, September 1993]. Jackson, who bears a striking resemblance to the late Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, had volunteered to serve that day as a field marshal responsible for helping protect Dr. King.

Have you ever wondered who was that lone White man sitting on the bus with Rosa Parks when she finally desegregated the Montgomery bus system? The New York Times reported on December 9 that it was Nicholas C. Chriss, a reporter for United Press International (UPI), based in Atlanta. He died of an aneurysm at the age of 62 in 1990, with most people not knowing his identity. The photo was taken Dec. 21, 1956 after the U.S. Supreme Court had declared the city’s segregated bus system illegal.

Sunday, December 11, 2005


Manhattan Hotels for less than $250 a Night

The average cost of a New York City hotel is $299, not counting the 13.6 pecent for taxes. According to the New York Times, http://travel2.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/travel/11nyhotels.html a local Holiday Inn Express costs more than the Ritz-Carlton in St. Louis ($259 per night). Below are the best available hotel "bargains."


10 Hotels for Under $250 a Night
By Denny Lee
(c) The New York Times
December 11, 2005


To find an affordable hotel room in Manhattan, do your research and book early. Rates vary wildly, depending on the season and availability. Prices tend to be highest in the fall, when conventioneers converge on the city, and again in December, when holiday shoppers bump elbows. Special events like a United Nations meeting or the New York City Marathon can also jack up prices dramatically. Like air fare, a room that goes for $199 one night can jump to
$399 the next.

Deals can sometimes be found through Web discounters like Hotels.com, Expedia.com and Tablethotels.com. If rooms are sold out online, call the hotels directly and ask about last-minute cancellations.

Travelers should also budget for city, state and occupancy taxes, which come to 13.625 percent, plus $3.50 a night. The rates below - some from the hotels, some from online reservation services - were for fall, before higher holiday rates kicked in, and were for the least expensive room, single or double.

Affinia Dumont, 150 East 34th Street (Lexington and Third Avenues), 212-481-7600; www.affinia.com. From $199. A business and pet-friendly spot with gym and spa.

Chelsea Hotel, 222 West 23rd Street (Seventh and Eighth Avenues), 212-243-3700; www.hotelchelsea.com. From $195. The storied bohemian landmark.

Doubletree Metropolitan, 569 Lexington Avenue (51st Street), 212-752-7000;
www.metropolitanhotelnyc.com. From $159. A recently renovated Morris Lapidus landmark.

Excelsior Hotel, 45 West 81st Street (Central Park West and Columbus Avenue), 212-362-9200; www.excelsiorhotelny.com. From $229. Cozy Upper West Side elegance, steps from Central Park.

Gershwin Hotel, 7 East 27th Street (Fifth and Madison Avenues), 212-545-8000; www.gershwinhotel.com. From $119. Hotel-cum-hostel popular with young Europeans.

Hotel QT, 125 West 45th Street (Avenue of the Americas and Seventh Avenue), 212-354-2323; www.hotelqt.com. From $125. A cheap chic hotel by André Balazs.

Hotel Stanford, 43 West 32nd Street (Broadway and Fifth Avenue), 800-365-1114;
www.hotelstanford.com. From $189. The staff at this Koreatown hotel speaks Korean and English (and Spanish).

Hudson Hotel, 356 West 58th Street (Eighth and Ninth Avenues), 212-554-6000;
www.hudsonhotel.com. From $199. A former Y.W.C.A. redesigned by Philippe Starck.

Off SoHo Suites Hotel, 11 Rivington Street (Bowery and Chrystie Streets), 800-633-7646; www.offsoho.com. Economy rooms from $199 (sharing kitchen and bath with another room); suites from $189. Euro-style suites between SoHo and the Lower East Side.

The Time, 224 West 49th Street (Broadway and Eighth Avenue), 877-846-3692; www.thetimeny.com. From $189. Another hip, high-concept hotel in Times Square.

Saturday, December 10, 2005


Every Execution Detail Prescribed

By Dan Morain

© Los Angeles Times

December 10, 2005

SACRAMENTO — Barring clemency from the governor or a last-minute stay, Stanley Tookie Williams will be expected to walk on his own to the death chamber Monday at San Quentin State Prison.

If all goes according to procedure, Williams will not struggle as prison officers strap him to the injection table, connect the monitors that will record the final beats of his heart and insert the needles through which lethal chemicals will flow into his arms, once massive from lifting weights.

The death chamber will be equipped with 12 rolls of adhesive tape, 20 syringes, 10 needles, 15 tubes of varying sizes, four bags of saline solution, scissors, six tourniquets, two boxes of surgical gloves and one box each of surgical masks and alcohol wipes. There will be handcuffs and leg irons.

Nothing is left to chance. The choreography has been refined over the course of 11 executions at San Quentin since 1992 and hundreds before that. The smallest detail — including the dose and combination of chemicals that will sedate Williams, paralyze him and cause his death — is set forth in a 43-page document, San Quentin Operational Procedure No. 770.

Indeed, as the governor ponders clemency and as final appeals are readied, the steps laid out in Procedure 770 already are being taken. The long walk it prescribes for Williams — co-founder of the Crips street gang and convicted murderer of four people — began Oct. 26, when acting Warden J.D. Stokes appeared at his cell and read him the execution warrant.

Since that day, prison officials have been dismantling the life that Williams has known since he arrived on death row in 1981, and seeking to desensitize him to his impending death. The prison chaplain has visited Williams to "assess his spiritual and emotional well-being," as the rules dictate, and his "attitudes or thoughts on death and dying."

Williams was moved, in shackles, to a cellblock at the north end of the turn-of-the-century prison by San Francisco Bay. San Quentin houses 649 condemned inmates, but the 68 in "North Seg" — the original death row — have, in some ways, the best location. Cells are larger than most, inmates have their own exercise yard, and they can mingle on the open tier.

A team of officers began watching Williams around the clock Thursday, logging his activity at 15-minute intervals. Unusual behavior must be reported to the warden.

In 1967, Aaron Mitchell, condemned for the murder of a Sacramento police officer, ranted that he was Jesus Christ and slit his wrists on the night before his execution.

With his life perhaps measured in days, Williams does get some privileges. He can receive more visitors than usual. Celebrities, friends and reporters have come calling.

"The inmate and the visitor(s) may briefly embrace or shake hands at the beginning and end of the visit. No other physical contact will be allowed," Procedure 770 says.

Williams' lawyers have additional access but are limited to bringing "one pen or pencil, one note pad, necessary legal materials." There will be "constant visual observation" by guards.

On the third day before an execution — today — the chamber will be closed to anyone not cleared by the warden. The lieutenant in charge of the chamber controls the keys.

The chamber is in a self-contained unit at San Quentin. It has two holding cells, in case two executions are scheduled for the same day. There is an officers' area and a place for witnesses to stand. The unit is cleaned and sanitized daily.

On Sunday, the lieutenant must inventory the equipment and chemicals. Outdated items must be replaced immediately.

On Monday, the 5,500 inmates at San Quentin will stay locked in their cells. It falls to prison officers to carry out the ultimate punishment, and they enlist the help of the condemned. "Our process begins with us interacting with the inmate," said Lt. Vernell Crittendon, a San Quentin officer who has witnessed all executions since 1992.

The prison staff has no fewer than 40 conversations with the condemned inmate, he said. The prison wants to ensure that nothing comes as a surprise

"There is constant contact," Crittendon said. "All subjects are covered. All are focused around the demise of the individual."

Robert Johnson, professor of justice, law and society at American University in Washington D.C., said a condemned prisoner thinks about whether the death "will be a dignified one or undignified."

"Cooperation, almost collusion, allows [prisoners] the sense of dignity," said Johnson, author of "Death Work, a Study of the Modern Execution Process."

For the most part, executions since 1992 have gone as planned, according to Crittendon, an accomplishment he attributes to "the preparation of the staff and the preparation of the inmate."

So far, Williams "has not agreed to be a part of any of the normal procedures," said Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokesman Todd Slosek. The prisoner declined, for example, to specify whether he wanted to be executed by gas or injection. The default method is injection, Slosek said.

On Thursday, when procedure dictated that Williams' belongings, including a toothbrush, be taken from his cell, he was "upset," according to Slosek. Officers will return the items if he requests them, but he must give each back when he's done with it.Removal of such objects is "a security issue," Slosek said.

Barbara Becnel, Williams' close friend and confidant, said it's a question of dignity; he must even give up his bedding when he wakes in the morning. And when she visited him Thursday, he was shackled, unlike on past visits.Becnel said the prison has "created a more harsh reality for Stanley Tookie Williams."

On Monday, one member of the execution team — whose identities remain secret under Procedure 770 — will take possession of the drugs needed to perform it, until the substances are needed or returned unused. Officers will test the phone lines that run from the execution chamber to the California Supreme Court and the state attorney general's office. That's in case a stay is granted, as it was in 1992, after Robert Alton Harris, the first person executed in California after a 25-year gap, had been strapped in the gas chamber.

On Monday, an escort team will strip-search and shackle the prisoner in his cell. Then "the inmate, wearing only underwear, is escorted to the holding cell, where he is retained pending an unclothed body search, which includes a metal detector scan," says Procedure 770. The prisoner receives new clothes: undershirt, shorts, socks, blue jeans, blue shirt and canvas slippers. Once clothed and placed back in restraints, the inmate is walked to the elevator and rides down six tiers, to the death-watch cell.

The cell has a bed and mattress, blanket, pillow, heater, radio, television, three sets of state-issued clothes, towels and a chess and checkers set. A lieutenant will tell the inmate that dinner is served at 6 p.m., and introduces the sergeant and two officers who will stand watch throughout Monday evening. Valium or another relaxant will be available if the inmate requests it and health authorities approve.

The condemned inmate is also allowed "reasonable last requests," including special food and a choice of radio or television programs. Some inmates refuse last meals; Williams had not ordered one as of Friday. Robert Lee Massie, executed in 2001, requested well-done fried oysters, french fries, two vanilla milkshakes and soft drinks. Harris' 1992 meal included Domino's pizza, KFC chicken and Pepsi.

Two hours before the execution — scheduled for one minute past midnight — the injection team will check that supplies are in place. An hour before the execution, the team readies the tubes and needles. Visits to Williams will have ended, but the inmate's attorney can call, and a spiritual advisor, if Williams wants one, can stay with him until 45 minutes before the execution.

The warden will arrive, speak briefly with Williams — perhaps hearing his last words — and direct that witnesses take their places. There is space for 50 witnesses, whose identities the prison does not reveal. Among them may be five witnesses and two spiritual advisors chosen by the inmate, victims' family members and reporters. Williams has not requested that any of his own family members or close friends be permitted to witness his execution, should it occur. If it does, Williams will walk to the death chamber once witnesses are in place.

The execution team will strap him to a gurney and connect him intravenously to two bags of saline solution. No member of the San Quentin staff may address team members by name or ask them anything that would require an oral response. After a final time check, Warden Steven Ornoski will order that the flow of saline cease and be replaced with lethal agents: first, the sedative sodium pentothal, then potassium chloride to paralyze Williams and, finally, pancuronium bromide to stop his heart.

The identity of the person who has inserted the poison will not be revealed. The infusion will continue until the prison doctor pronounces Williams dead. The execution chamber will be shut with a curtain." The body shall be removed with care and dignity and placed in a body bag," says Procedure 770. "The chamber should then be cleaned thoroughly."

Friday, December 09, 2005


Mexican Immigration

A new report by the Pew Hispanic Center http://pewhispanic.org/ reveals that the 6.3 million Mexicans who came to the U.S. illegally did so because of better job opportunities and family connections. "Our perception of the unauthorized workforce is that these people who are desperate, (who) would do something illegal," Rakesh Kochhar, author of the report, told USA Today. "This is not the case. Unemployment is not a motivation. The typical motivation is opportunity and long-term prospects." Most of the undocumented workers already held jobs in Mexico and came to the U.S. to obtain better paying work, the report says.